A successful hire is not measured at signature, but at day 90.
Use case · Employee Experience
97% of employees consider onboarding a defining moment for their engagement. Yet one in three leaves before the end of the trial period after a failed integration. Between signature and day one, then through the first months, every step either confirms or weakens your new hire's choice.
The cost of a failed onboarding is rarely visible at the time. It shows up later: productivity pushed back by months, a hire to restart from scratch, a team absorbing the gap and a poor signal sent to the market when an early departure gets talked about. Conversely, well-run first weeks turn a signature into conviction: the new hire knows why they are there, what is expected of them and who to talk to.
Engagement is not declared on day one, it is built on a continuum that starts before arrival and continues well beyond the trial period. We frame every step so that none rests on improvisation or on the goodwill of an overstretched manager.
D-30 → D0
Keeping the link alive between signature and day one, welcome kit, early access to useful information, a first taste of the culture so nothing is discovered on the first morning.
Day 1 → Wk 2
The first two weeks mapped out in advance: a named buddy, tools and access ready, team rituals, clear first objectives rather than an empty diary.
Month 1 → 3
Structured feedback at regular intervals, 30-60-90 objectives, managerial check-ins to clear doubts on both sides before the end of the trial period.
Month 3+
Mobility, mentoring, growing responsibility, internal ambassadors, and a respectful offboarding when the time comes, because how people leave gets talked about too.
Most early departures come not from a bad hire, but from an integration left to chance. The leaks almost always show up in the same places:
Contact
A call to assess your integration journey and find the leaks.
Book a call →